← ripcitynotripoff.com
Rip City, Not Rip Off · ripcitynotripoff.com/press

Press & Media

A volunteer Portland campaign on the Moda Center public-funding fight. Keep the Blazers, renovate the arena — but publish a fair lease before the public commits more than a billion dollars. Lease enforcer, not deal killer.

The story in one paragraph

Portland — the public — owns the Moda Center. The City is preparing to commit $1 billion+ in public money to renovate it for an owner who just bought the Blazers for $4.25 billion, pays $1 a year in rent, and is being asked to contribute $0. Every comparable NBA city secured rent, revenue, or private capital back; the deal on the table returns the public nothing on every line. City Council votes on the term sheet Aug 12, 2026 — and under SB 1501, no bonds issue until the City signs, so the terms can still be set. The campaign's ask is simple: publish the lease, revenue waterfall, ROI model, and benchmarks, and land inside a market range before the vote.

Contact

Reach us — same-day response to press

Edan Krolewicz & Jonathan Pulvers, organizers

Message us on Bluesky: @ripcitynotripoff.bsky.social — happy to go on the record, walk through the documents, or brief your desk.

Quote sheet — attributable to the organizers

“We’re Blazers fans. We want the team to stay and the Moda Center renovated — we just want a fair lease in place before the public commits more than a billion dollars. That’s not anti-Blazers; it’s how a serious public-private deal works.”

— Rip City, Not Rip Off

“Portland owns this building. The owner pays a dollar a year, just sold the team for $4.25 billion, and is being asked to put in nothing. Every comparable NBA city got rent, revenue, or private capital back. Council holds the leverage — under the law, no public money moves until the City signs. They should use it.”

— Rip City, Not Rip Off

“We’re not asking Council to kill the deal. We’re asking them to publish the terms and land inside a market range before the August 12 vote. The December ‘deadline’ isn’t in either statute — there’s time to get this right.”

— Rip City, Not Rip Off

Press kit

High-resolution chart exports and the verified 16-deal dataset are available on request via Bluesky.

Questions reporters should ask before Aug. 12

The missing deal terms
  1. Will the term sheet include owner/operator capital, rent, or substitute rent?
  2. Will the public share in new premium-seat, naming-rights, sponsorship, parking, ticket-fee, or district revenue?
  3. Which PCEF-funded line items are climate outcomes, who owns the improvements, and who keeps operating savings?
  4. Has the SB 1501 comparable-arena review been retained, and will it be public before the vote?
  5. If relocation risk is driving concessions, what written relocation BATNA has the City reviewed?

These questions are tracked in the public-protection matrix.

How we got here — a sourced timeline

Who we are

Rip City, Not Rip Off is a volunteer-run, unfunded campaign by Portland residents and Blazers fans. We take no money from any team, the City, or a competing developer. We read the bills, ran the numbers, and publish our sources — and we correct ourselves on the record when we get something wrong.

In the press: KATU · KGW · Willamette Week · CBS Sports

ripcitynotripoff.com · Press contact: @ripcitynotripoff.bsky.social. Every figure on this site is sourced to an enacted statute, an executed contract, a verified peer deal, or the City’s own study; primary documents are hosted on the site.