Skip to main content
Rip City, Not Rip Off
Attach the exhibit first. Email your city councilors →
The construction bargain

Define the project.
Close the gaps.

A funding headline does not settle the scope, the completion risk or the public’s final exposure.

Updated September 8, 2026Sources & corrections ↗

The short version. A headline funding ceiling is not a complete project budget. No essential exhibit, completion gap or uncapped public exception should survive closing.

A cap must survive the difficult cases

01

Scope changes

Name the approving party, the payer and the effect on the public maximum.

02

An overrun

Commit completion funding before the public money is exhausted.

03

Delayed funds

Define a safe, funded phase and who carries bridging costs.

04

A failed operator

Protect unfinished work, public title and a practical transition.

Define the deliverable

Require mature scope, independent estimates, schedule, contingencies, eligible uses and acceptance. Separate new investment from existing duties. Tie each draw to work certification, matching contributions and sufficient remaining funds. Allocate every overrun and change category explicitly.

Sources: August 12 City term sheet

The clocks do not all end together

SB 1501 §5 conditions issuance and specified tax transfers on the executed lease and sufficient local commitments. Local commitments therefore cannot simply be conditioned on bonds already existing in a way that defeats the statute. Use a legally coordinated closing with separately defined construction and disbursement gates.

SB 1501 §4 tax capture runs through the statutory period based on the later of lease expiration and debt payoff. A contract cannot alone end capture at payoff while a longer lease continues. The statutory quarterly reporting provision sunsets January 2, 2032, so permanent reporting must be contractual.

The law requires expert comparables work; it does not expressly require a separate published final-deal-terms report in the form the former Register demanded. That can be a new public approval requirement. December is a consequential local negotiating/administrative target, not a signing cliff written into SB 1501. State tranche authorizations and practical issuance lead time still constrain delay.

Sources: Enrolled SB 1501 · Enrolled SB 5701 · August 12 City term sheet

The public cap test

Specify maximum exposure by government, account, year and use, including financing, enabling work, utilities and administration. Preserve receipt-conditioned continuing support. A scope change or accounting label must not silently turn a ceiling into a guarantee.

How these numbers fit together
$573MProposed public renovation portion: State $365M, City $120M, County $88M. The adopted negotiating documents still need a reconciled funding plan and complete project budget. Proposal verified
Up to $288.6MContinuing contribution ceilings: City $275M plus County $13.6M. Annual limits and actual-receipt conditions matter; these are not unconditional cash commitments. Proposal verified
$861.6M$573M + $288.6M: combined nominal framework ceilings before financing costs. This is neither a present value nor a binding all-in expenditure. Do not add repayment of the same borrowed principal twice. Calculated
$3.17M + $3MProposed initial annual rent and tax-offset payment. Rent begins at the specified post-renovation commencement and escalates by the lesser of CPI-W or 3%; the tax offset grows 5%. Start dates, recipients and credits still matter. These are not the public’s only receipts. Proposal verified
UnvaluedThe maintenance claim, new commercial rights and operating alternatives require legal, engineering and financial valuation. A lifecycle cost estimate is not a damages award; gross venue revenue is not profit.

Verified describes what a source says, not that a proposed obligation is signed or funded. The reconciled ledger and sources →