Skip to main content
Rip City, Not Rip Off
A public comparison checklist

Compare the
complete bargain.

Six lenses for evaluating arena precedents without mistaking one favorable term for a market price.

Updated September 8, 2026Sources & corrections ↗

What belongs in the comparison

01

Construction

New arena or renovation? Equalize scope, dates and indirect public support.

02

Commercial rights

Identify who keeps naming, parking, premium seating and event income.

03

Land and duration

Value property rights, infrastructure, renewal options and extra years.

04

Future obligations

Identify lifecycle costs, insurance, reserves and exposure after default.

A better comparison

ProvisionPortland baselineRequired comparison
Rent$3.17M proposed initial annual rentCommencement, escalation, credits and present value.
Private cashNo settled minimum in the public proposalNew capital relative to independently costed scope.
Commercial rightsExisting operator rights and proposed long extensionRevenue base, public share, tax and land benefits as a whole.
MaintenanceExisting standards plus proposed future allocationExisting liability, lifecycle funding and surrender condition.
EnforcementBridge rights plus proposed replacementsReal obligors, consents, security and default continuity.

Sources: August 12 City term sheet · State PFM comparables review