Tickets & premium seating
Separate existing receipts from the renovation’s incremental demand and margin.
Price the commercial rights using actual accounts, rather than an assumed return on construction cost.
The short version. Premium seating, naming, concessions, parking and events are valuable rights. Their net value is unverified; the former $2.5 billion headline is withdrawn.
Separate existing receipts from the renovation’s incremental demand and margin.
Trace bundled agreements, prepaid rights and surviving license periods.
Use the defined fee bases and deduct real costs and contractual offsets.
Reconcile event-level settlements, calendars and affiliate allocations.
Verified describes what a source says, not that a proposed obligation is signed or funded. The reconciled ledger and sources →
We retire the combined $1.1–1.2 billion “market-standard return” floor, the $2.5 billion arena-value headline and the claim that security is free to a compliant owner. Comparables show feasible mechanisms; they do not prove every favorable provision can be combined at the same price. PFM includes fully publicly funded renovations and notes limits to what its capital comparisons capture.
An assumed yield on construction cost does not establish demand, new revenue or profit. Gross receipts are not net income. Franchise appreciation may capitalize earnings already counted. Avoided repairs, future maintenance, guarantees, principal and debt service can overlap. A tax deduction’s value depends on the actual taxpayer and timing; a generic cents-on-the-dollar claim is inadequate.
Relocation has obstacles and requires NBA action, but its probability is not established as zero. Expansion exploration is not a completed award of two markets. Conversely, neither a forced franchise sale nor a tenant-controlled option is an alternative the City can simply elect. Price the actual choices, including delay and tenant disruption.
Sources: State PFM comparables review · NBA expansion announcement · Exclusive Site Agreement approval exhibit